Loto-Quebec and Montreal Public Health Clash

Loto-Quebec received critique from Montreal Public Health over a games lounge proposal. The lounge, associated with the Montreal Canadiens, is viewed as a normalization of chance and money games. The report claims the Montreal Canadiens have a large fan base.

Many generations look up to players who’ve made history. The Bell Centre, the Canadiens’ home, is a cultural and entertainment hub. In this context, the public health body predicts an increased awareness of electronic gaming devices.

Montreal Public Health refused to recommend the proposal. They also advised Loto-Quebec to reduce the number of electronic gaming device sites since 2017. It looks like this clash between Loto-Quebec and Montreal Public Health over the gaming proposal won’t be resolved anytime soon.

Montreal Public Health’s Warning and Loto-Quebec’s Response

Montreal Public Health not only refused to endorse the proposal. It also urged Loto-Quebec to continue reducing the number of ALV (video lottery) sites. Since 2017, the number of ALV sites has been declining in Montreal. Loto-Quebec is advised not to grant additional operating permits for these machines.

Their decision to release the report to the media upset Loto-Quebec. Spokesperson Renaud Dugas expressed surprise at the move. Loto-Quebec had expected the report to be delivered to them, not journalists. Dugas noted that Loto-Quebec had cooperated with Montreal Public Health for two years on this matter. This was even before the proposal was formally submitted.

Dugas noted that they’ve been open and transparent from the start. They’ve answered all questions and always been ready to address concerns.

The Future of Gaming in Montreal

The report and Loto-Quebec’s response reveal a tension between public health concerns and gaming interests. Electronic gaming devices like blackjack, scratch card games, and those powered by Novomatic software are becoming increasingly popular. Yet, public health bodies warn of the potential risks associated with their proliferation. This situation in Montreal highlights the global debate about the role and regulation of gaming in society.

Nevertheless, Montreal Public Health has failed to provide clear evidence that the mini casino would have caused harm. They merely noted their concerns about gaming sites in general. In their view, this should be reason enough not to authorize the project. Loto-Quebec disagreed and presented a counter argument based on economic and cultural benefits of the proposed casino.